Tools › Fluids and Heat Transfer › Conduction › Transient Conduction


Transient Conduction

Temperature against time in a solid after a step change at its surface, by five analyses: the exact series solution for a plane wall, a long cylinder and a sphere with convection at the surface (eigenvalues solved to machine precision, any number of terms, the one-term approximation beside it with its Fo > 0.2 validity, and the Heisler and Gröber charts redrawn for the entered Biot number); lumped capacitance with the Biot-number check, radiation, internal generation and an optional second node; the semi-infinite solid with a step in surface temperature, a constant flux, surface convection, contact of two solids and a periodic surface temperature (damping depth, phase lag, frost-depth estimate); product solutions for a short cylinder, a rectangular bar and a brick; and a one-dimensional finite-difference solver (explicit with its stability limit, or Crank–Nicolson) for a wall of up to three layers. The default is a 50 mm steel plate quenched from 800 °C in oil at 60 °C with h = 500 W/(m²⋅K), an illustrative case checked against scipy and the root tables of Abramowitz and Stegun.

  • Exact series for the wall, cylinder and sphere: center, surface and any-position temperature, mean temperature, heat transferred Q/Q0, time to reach a temperature

  • One-term approximation with its validity flag; Heisler and Gröber charts regenerated for the entered Biot number

  • Lumped capacitance with radiation, generation and a second node; semi-infinite solid with five surface conditions; product solutions in two and three dimensions

  • Finite-difference solver for a multilayer wall, explicit or Crank–Nicolson, with the temperature profile at selected times; material list from NUREG-1805 and MIL-HDBK-5J

Transient Conduction


Unit System: /

Analysis and Material (k in W/(m⋅K), density in kg/m³, cp in J/(kg⋅K) in both unit systems)






Conditions and Options (temperatures in °C, time in s, h in W/(m²⋅K), heat flux in W/m² in both unit systems)

































Geometry























×

Transient Conduction

Transient Conduction

When the surroundings of a solid change suddenly, its temperature does not follow at once: heat has to diffuse in from the surface. This tool answers the usual questions of that process (how hot is the center after a given time, how long until a point reaches a temperature, how much heat has been exchanged) by five analyses that share one set of inputs. All of them assume constant properties and no change of phase. The thermal quantities are entered in SI units in both unit systems (k in W/(m⋅K), ρ in kg/m³, cp in J/(kg⋅K), h in W/(m²⋅K), heat flux in W/m², temperatures in °C, time in s); lengths follow the unit system.

Symbols

α = k/(ρ cp) is the thermal diffusivity. For a body of half-thickness or radius L the Biot number Bi = h L/k compares the resistance inside the body with the resistance of the surface film, and the Fourier number Fo = α t/L² is the dimensionless time. θ* = (T − T∞)/(Ti − T∞) is the fraction of the initial temperature difference still present: 1 at the start, 0 when the body has reached the fluid temperature. Cooling and heating are the same problem.

Lumped capacitance

If the body conducts so well that it is nearly at one temperature, an energy balance on the whole body gives ρ cp V dT/dt = −h A (T − T∞), whose solution is the exponential θ* = exp(−t/τ) with the time constant τ = ρ cp V/(h A). The model holds when the Biot number formed with the length Lc = V/A is below about 0.1 (Lc is L for the wall, L/2 for the cylinder, L/3 for the sphere); the tool prints the check and, beside the lumped value, the exact center, surface and mean temperatures of the same body so that the error is visible.

With uniform internal generation q‴ the balance stays linear, θ = θi exp(−t/τ) + (q‴V/(hA))(1 − exp(−t/τ)), and the body tends to T∞ + q‴V/(hA). With radiation to large surroundings the term ε σ A (T⁴ − Tsur⁴) makes the equation non-linear; the tool integrates it by the fourth-order Runge–Kutta method with a step of one fiftieth of the shortest time constant. For radiation alone the equation separates, and the time to cool from Ti to T is the closed form (absolute temperatures)

t = [ρ cp V/(4 ε σ A Tsur³)] { ln|(Tsur + T)/(Tsur − T)| − ln|(Tsur + Ti)/(Tsur − Ti)| + 2 [tan⁻¹(T/Tsur) − tan⁻¹(Ti/Tsur)] },

which is printed as a comparison when a target temperature is entered. The optional second node is an inner mass of capacity C2 joined to the body by a conductance G (a core, a fitting, a filling): the two linear equations have two exponential modes, a fast one in which the two masses equalize and a slow one in which they cool together, and the tool gives both time constants and both temperatures. Radiation and generation are not carried into the two-node model.

Plane wall, long cylinder and sphere: the exact series

For a wall cooled on both faces, a long cylinder or a sphere, initially uniform and exposed to a fluid with a constant coefficient, separation of variables gives

θ* = Σ Cn exp(−ζn² Fo) fn(x/L),

BodyRoots ζn ofCnfnVolume mean of fn
Plane wallζ tan ζ = Bi4 sin ζ/(2ζ + sin 2ζ)cos(ζ x/L)sin ζ/ζ
Long cylinderζ J1(ζ)/J0(ζ) = Bi(2/ζ) J1(ζ)/(J0²(ζ) + J1²(ζ))J0(ζ r/L)2 J1(ζ)/ζ
Sphere1 − ζ cot ζ = Bi4 (sin ζ − ζ cos ζ)/(2ζ − sin 2ζ)sin(ζ r/L)/(ζ r/L)3 (sin ζ − ζ cos ζ)/ζ³

The roots are bracketed between the poles and zeros of the characteristic function (for the cylinder between successive zeros of J1 and J0) and found by bisection to the last bit; the Bessel functions are evaluated from Bessel's integral below an argument of 25 and from Hankel's asymptotic series above it. At least fifty terms are summed, and more as Fo falls (the number is chosen so that the last term is below 10−13, up to 3,000), so the series is used at any time for which the body is not better treated as semi-infinite. The heat transferred up to time t, as a fraction of Qo = ρ cp V (Ti − T∞), is 1 minus the volume mean of θ*. The time at which a point reaches a given temperature is solved by bisection on the series, which is safe because the temperature at every point moves monotonically towards the fluid temperature.

One-term approximation. All terms after the first die out quickly, and for Fo > 0.2 the first term alone, θ* ≈ C1 exp(−ζ1² Fo) f1, is within 2 % at the center (the largest errors at Fo = 0.2 are 1.8 % for the wall, 1.6 % for the cylinder and 1.0 % for the sphere, over all Biot numbers). The tool computes ζ1 and C1 for the entered Biot number instead of interpolating a table, prints the one-term values beside the series and flags them when Fo is below 0.2. At Bi = 1 the values are ζ1 = 0.8603, C1 = 1.1191 (wall), 1.2558 and 1.2071 (cylinder), 1.5708 and 1.2732 (sphere).

Charts. Heisler's charts (center temperature against Fo for lines of 1/Bi, and a position correction) and Gröber's chart (Q/Qo against Bi² Fo) were the working form of this solution before computers. The tool redraws all three from the full series for the chosen body, adds the line of the entered Biot number and marks the case. The position-correction chart is the first shape function and therefore shares the Fo > 0.2 limit; the other two are exact at every time drawn.

Check. Each run of the series is accompanied by an independent finite-difference solution of the same problem (200 cells, Crank–Nicolson), printed in the temperature table. A wall insulated on one face is the same problem with L its full thickness.

Semi-infinite solid

Early in any transient, and for all time in a very thick body, only a layer near the surface has changed and the far side plays no part. With η = x/(2√(α t)):

  • Surface temperature stepped to Ts: (T − Ts)/(Ti − Ts) = erf η; surface flux k (Ts − Ti)/√(π α t); heat absorbed per unit area 2 k (Ts − Ti) √(t/(π α)).
  • Constant surface flux qs: T − Ti = (2 qs/k) √(α t/π) exp(−η²) − (qs x/k) erfc η.
  • Surface convection: (T − Ti)/(T∞ − Ti) = erfc η − exp(h x/k + h² α t/k²) erfc(η + h √(α t)/k). The second term is computed as exp(−η²) times the scaled function exp(z²) erfc z, which stays finite however large the time.
  • Two solids brought into contact: the interface jumps to Ts = (eA TA + eB TB)/(eA + eB) with e = √(k ρ cp) the effusivity, and stays there; each solid follows the first solution. This is why a metal at room temperature feels colder than wood.
  • Periodic surface temperature Tm + A sin ω t (sustained state): T = Tm + A exp(−x/d) sin(ω t − x/d) with the damping depth d = √(2α/ω). The wave is reduced by e and delayed by 1/(2π) of a period for every d of depth; 4√(α/ω) is the usual penetration depth. The depth below which the temperature never drops under a threshold Tf is d ln[A/(Tm − Tf)]. With the yearly wave and 0 °C this is a first estimate of frost depth; it ignores the latent heat of freezing soil water, snow cover and the difference between air and ground-surface temperature, so it is not a design frost depth.

The depth at which the change is 1 % of a step at the surface is 3.643 √(α t) (10 % at 2.326 √(α t)); a wall thicker than that can be treated as semi-infinite up to the time t.

Product solutions

A short cylinder is the intersection of a long cylinder and a wall; a bar is the intersection of two walls and a brick of three. When the initial temperature is uniform and every face sees the same fluid, the solution in two or three dimensions is the product of the one-dimensional solutions, each with its own Bi and Fo: θ* = θ*1 θ*2 (θ*3). The tool lists the factors and the temperature at the center, at the middle of each face and edge and at the corner. The fraction of heat transferred is 1 − Π(mean of θ*i), which is Langston's rule (Q/Qo)1 + (Q/Qo)2[1 − (Q/Qo)1] + … written compactly. The product rule does not hold for different coefficients on opposite faces of one direction, for a non-uniform start or for a prescribed flux.

Multilayer wall by finite differences

Each layer is divided into equal cells with a node on every cell boundary, so that a node sits on each face and each interface. The energy balance of the control volume around node i is Ci dTi/dt = Ki−1(Ti−1 − Ti) + Ki(Ti+1 − Ti) (+ the boundary term), where K = k/Δx of the cell between two nodes and Ci is the heat capacity of the two half cells around the node; an interface node therefore carries half a cell of each material and no special interface equation is needed. A face may convect, be held at a temperature, receive a heat flux or be insulated.

The explicit scheme evaluates the right-hand side at the old time. It is stable only if the time step does not exceed Ci/ΣK at every node, which for an interior node is the familiar Δx²/(2α) (cell Fourier number ½) and for a convecting face Δx²/(2α(1 + h Δx/k)); the tool prints the limit, takes 0.8 of it by default and reduces a larger entered step. Thin, conductive layers make the limit very small, and the run is refused above 150,000 steps. The Crank–Nicolson scheme averages the right-hand side between the old and the new time, is stable for any step and second-order accurate; the tool starts it with two fully implicit steps so that a step change at a face does not ring. Both schemes conserve energy exactly, which the test script checks.

When the wall is a single layer with one insulated and one convecting face the tool prints the exact series beside the finite-difference result. The default (25 mm of steel, the half-plate of the default quench) agrees to 0.005 °C with 40 cells.

Material list

The list fills k, ρ and cp with typical room-temperature values from two public documents: Table 2-3 of NUREG-1805 (U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 2004; the table credits Klote and Milke) for building materials, pure aluminum and carbon steel, and the room-temperature physical-property lines of the MIL-HDBK-5J design tables for the alloys whose density, specific heat and conductivity are printed as numbers (converted from lb/in³, Btu/(lb⋅°F) and Btu/(h⋅ft⋅°F)). Properties change with temperature, strongly for steels above a few hundred degrees; for a wide temperature range enter values at the mean temperature of the process. The convection coefficient is also taken constant, which a real quench (film boiling, then nucleate boiling) does not satisfy; the default case is illustrative.

Limits

Constant properties and coefficient; no phase change, no contact resistance between layers; uniform initial temperature (except the periodic case); the same coefficient and fluid temperature on every face in the series and product analyses; one-dimensional conduction in the multilayer wall. The method was checked against Tables 4.19, 4.20 and 9.7 of Abramowitz and Stegun (roots of the three characteristic equations), against scipy, against a method-of-lines solution and against two-dimensional numerical solutions of a bar and a short cylinder.




References

Carslaw, H. S., and Jaeger, J. C. (1959). Conduction of Heat in Solids, 2nd ed. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

Heisler, M. P. (1947). "Temperature Charts for Induction and Constant-Temperature Heating." Transactions of the ASME, Vol. 69, No. 3, pp. 227–236.

Gröber, H., Erk, S., and Grigull, U. (1961). Fundamentals of Heat Transfer. McGraw-Hill, New York.

Incropera, F. P., DeWitt, D. P., Bergman, T. L., and Lavine, A. S. (2007). Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer, 6th ed. John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, NJ.

Langston, L. S. (1982). "Heat Transfer from Multidimensional Objects Using One-Dimensional Solutions for Heat Loss." International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 149–150.

Crank, J., and Nicolson, P. (1947). "A Practical Method for Numerical Evaluation of Solutions of Partial Differential Equations of the Heat-Conduction Type." Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, Vol. 43, No. 1, pp. 50–67.

Abramowitz, M., and Stegun, I. A. (eds.) (1964). Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables. National Bureau of Standards Applied Mathematics Series 55, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.

Iqbal, N., and Salley, M. H. (2004). Fire Dynamics Tools (FDTs): Quantitative Fire Hazard Analysis Methods for the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Fire Protection Inspection Program. NUREG-1805, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC.

U.S. Department of Defense (2003). Metallic Materials and Elements for Aerospace Vehicle Structures. MIL-HDBK-5J, 31 January 2003.

Worked Examples

Published examples this tool reproduces; each page lists the inputs to enter and the printed answers.

All worked examples


DISCLAIMER: The methods and calculation on aNOWysis.com are provided as means to educate the reader. There is no warranty, expessed or implied, as to the relevance or accuracy of the methods or calculations. All calculations should be checked by a qualified analyst for appropriateness and accuracy. We will not be held liable for any damages, injuries or deaths caused by using methods or calculations from this site.