Tools › Structures › Materials › Reference Stress


Reference Stress and Proportional Limit

The following analysis calculates the compressive reference stresses at secant Moduli .7 Ec and .7 G. The proportional limits for compression and shear are also calculated.

  • Used to calculate inelastic buckling corrections from nondimensional figures

  • Proportional limit is used to differentiate elastic and inelastic buckling so that corrections can be made

Material Properties Input


Unit System: /

Compression Material Allowables

Sign in




Shear Material Allowables (Optional)






×

Reference Stress Derivation

1. Reference Stress at 0.7Ec Secant Modulus (F0.7)

Starting Point: Ramberg-Osgood Equation

The Ramberg-Osgood stress-strain relationship is:

ε = f/E + (3/7) × (F0.7/E) × (f/F0.7)n

Secant Modulus Definition

The secant modulus at any stress level f is defined as:

Esecant = f / ε

Finding F0.7

By definition, F0.7 is the stress where the secant modulus equals 0.7Ec:

Esecant = 0.7Ec

Substituting the Ramberg-Osgood equation at f = F0.7:

ε = F0.7/Ec + (3/7) × (F0.7/Ec) × (F0.7/F0.7)n

ε = F0.7/Ec + (3/7) × (F0.7/Ec)

ε = F0.7/Ec × (1 + 3/7)

ε = F0.7/Ec × (10/7)

Therefore, the secant modulus is:

Esecant = F0.7 / ε = F0.7 / (F0.7/Ec × 10/7) = Ec × (7/10) = 0.7Ec ✓

The 3/7 Factor

The factor 3/7 comes from the secant modulus criterion:

3/7 = 1/0.7 - 1

Solving for F0.7 from Fcy and n

The handbook gives Fcy, not F0.7. The two are linked by the definition of the yield stress: Fcy is the stress at a plastic strain of 0.2 percent (the 0.002 offset). Setting f = Fcy in the plastic term of the Ramberg-Osgood equation:

0.002 = (3/7) × (F0.7/Ec) × (Fcy/F0.7)n

F0.7n-1 = [3 / (7 × 0.002)] × Fcyn / Ec

F0.7 = Fcy × (k × Fcy / Ec)1/(n-1)

The Coefficient 214.3

The constant k is nothing more than the 3/7 secant factor divided by the yield offset:

k = 3 / (7 × 0.002) = (3/7) × 500 = 214.3

(500 is 1/0.002.) It carries no empirical content and does not depend on the structural element; the plasticity reduction factors of NACA TN 3781 are applied later, in the buckling tools that use F0.7 and n.

This gives the final equation:

F0.7 = Fcy × (214.3 × Fcy / Ec)1/(n-1)


2. Shear Reference Stress at 0.7G Secant Modulus (F0.7s)

Analogous Derivation for Shear

The derivation for shear follows the same principles as the compression case, using the shear Ramberg-Osgood equation:

γ = τ/G + (3/7) × (F0.7s/G) × (τ/F0.7s)ns

where:

  • γ = shear strain
  • τ = shear stress
  • G = shear modulus
  • Fsy = shear yield stress
  • ns = shear Ramberg-Osgood shape factor

Shear Inputs: Fsy and ns

The shear section of the form takes the shear modulus G and the tensile ultimate, tensile yield and shear ultimate strengths (Ftu, Fty, Fsu), all of which the material dropdown fills from the handbook. The handbook gives neither a shear yield stress nor a shear shape factor, so the tool derives both.

Shear yield stress. The shear yield-to-ultimate ratio is taken equal to the tensile yield-to-ultimate ratio:

Fsy = Fsu × (Fty / Ftu)

Shear shape factor. If the shear stress-strain curve is the von Mises image of the compression curve, the stresses and plastic strains map as

τ = σ / √3     and     γp = √3 × εp

Applying that map to the plastic term of the compression curve, (σ/F0.7)n, gives (√3 τ / F0.7)n = (τ / F0.7s)n, with F0.7s = F0.7/√3. The map rescales the stress axis and the strain axis but leaves the exponent unchanged, so

ns = n

The tool uses this value when the shear shape factor is left blank. A value typed in the ns field, for example from a measured shear stress-strain curve, overrides it.

The Coefficient 123.7

The same algebra applies in shear once the offset that defines Fsy is fixed. Under the von Mises map above, the 0.2 percent normal-strain offset becomes a shear-strain offset of 0.002 × √3 = 0.00346, so

ks = 3 / (7 × 0.002 × √3) = (3/7) × 288.7 ≈ 123.7

Older references round 288.7 to 289 and use 123.9; the tool uses the exact 123.7. The difference is 0.15 percent in ks before the 1/(ns-1) power, far below the precision of the inputs.

This gives the final equation:

F0.7s = Fsy × (123.7 × Fsy / G)1/(ns-1)


Summary

Both equations follow from the Ramberg-Osgood stress-strain relationship, the definition of the secant modulus at 0.7 times the elastic modulus, and the offset that defines the yield stress. The numerical coefficients (214.3 and 123.7) combine:

  • The factor 3/7 from the 0.7 secant modulus criterion
  • The reciprocal of the yield offset: 1/0.002 = 500 in compression, and 1/(0.002 × √3) = 288.7 in shear, the von Mises image of the same offset

The reference stress F0.7 and the nondimensional buckling curves indexed by F0.7 and n are due to Cozzone and Melcon (1946); the three-parameter curve is Ramberg and Osgood's (NACA TN 902); the shape factor n can be found from two offset yield strengths by Hill's method (NACA TN 927); the plasticity reduction factors that use these quantities are tabulated by Gerard and Becker (NACA TN 3781).




References

Cozzone, F. P., and Melcon, M. A. (1946). "Nondimensional Buckling Curves: Their Development and Application." Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences, Vol. 13, No. 10, pp. 511–517.

Ramberg, W., and Osgood, W. R. (1943). Description of Stress-Strain Curves by Three Parameters. NACA Technical Note 902, National Bureau of Standards, Washington, D.C.

Hill, H. N. (1944). Determination of Stress-Strain Relations from "Offset" Yield Strength Values. NACA Technical Note 927, Aluminum Company of America, New Kensington, PA.

Gerard, G., and Becker, H. (1957). Handbook of Structural Stability, Part I: Buckling of Flat Plates. NACA Technical Note 3781, New York University, New York.

U.S. Department of Defense (2003). Metallic Materials and Elements for Aerospace Vehicle Structures. MIL-HDBK-5J, 31 January 2003.


DISCLAIMER: The methods and calculation on aNOWysis.com are provided as means to educate the reader. There is no warranty, expessed or implied, as to the relevance or accuracy of the methods or calculations. All calculations should be checked by a qualified analyst for appropriateness and accuracy. We will not be held liable for any damages, injuries or deaths caused by using methods or calculations from this site.