Tools › Mechanical Design › Gears › Gear Stress


Gear Stress

Bending and contact stress of a spur gear pair by the Lewis equation with the Barth velocity factor and by the AGMA 2001-D04 rating method as presented in Shigley's Mechanical Engineering Design (Chapter 14): pitch-line velocity and transmitted load from the power and speed, the dynamic factor from the quality number, the size, load-distribution (Cmc, Cpf, Cpm, Cma, Ce), rim-thickness, reliability and temperature factors, the stress-cycle factors YN and ZN for the life, the hardness-ratio factor, the geometry factors I and J (J entered from the AGMA chart or computed by the AGMA 908-B89 tooth layout), the elastic coefficient, the allowable bending and contact stress numbers by material grade and Brinell hardness, the AGMA safety factors SF and SH for pinion and gear (with SH squared for the comparison on a load basis), the power rating at unit safety factor, margins of safety, a drawing of the pinion tooth with the Lewis parabola and the dynamic-factor chart. Default inputs are Shigley's Example 14-4 (17-tooth pinion at 1,800 rev/min driving a 52-tooth gear, 4 hp, 10 teeth/in, 1.5-in face, Qv 6, grade 1 through-hardened steels at 240 and 200 HB).

  • Lewis bending stress with the Barth velocity factor as a first check; AGMA bending stress (Eq. 14-15) and contact stress (Eq. 14-16) for pinion and gear

  • Every AGMA factor computed and shown: Kv from Qv, Ks, Km from its five terms, KB, KR, KT, YN, ZN, CH, Cp, I and J

  • Allowable stress numbers by material grade and hardness; AGMA safety factors SF and SH, SH squared for the comparison, power rating at unit safety factor

  • Geometry factor J entered from the AGMA chart or computed by the AGMA 908-B89 tooth layout; drawing of the tooth with the inscribed Lewis parabola

Gear Stress


Unit System: /

Gear Set (tooth size as diametral pitch in teeth per inch or module in mm)








Load and Speed






AGMA Rating Factors



















Materials (allowable stress numbers St and Sc by grade; hardness in Brinell)











Lewis Check


×

Gear Stress

Gear Stress: Lewis and AGMA Spur-Gear Rating

Scope

The tool rates one spur-gear mesh of standard full-depth involute teeth (20° or 25° pressure angle, addendum 1/P) in bending and in surface durability. It follows Chapter 14 of Shigley's Mechanical Engineering Design, 10th edition, which presents the ANSI/AGMA 2001-D04 method with the factors as the standard tabulates them, and it reproduces the book's Example 14-4 with the default inputs. Helical, bevel and worm gears, internal gears, non-standard addenda, scoring and lubrication are outside its scope.

Geometry and load

Pitch diameters d = N/P (P the diametral pitch in teeth per inch; a module m in millimetres is converted by P = 25.4/m), speed ratio mG = NG/NP, pitch-line velocity V = π dP nP/12 ft/min and transmitted tangential load Wt = 33,000 H/V with H in horsepower, or Wt = 2TP/dP from the pinion torque. Circular pitch p = π/P, base pitch pb = p cos φ.

Lewis equation

Lewis (1893) treated the tooth as a cantilever of constant strength: a parabola with its vertex at the point where the load line meets the tooth centreline and tangent to the root fillet defines the critical section of thickness t at a distance l below the vertex, and the bending stress there is σ = 6 Wt l/(F t²). With the dimensionless form factor Y = 2 x P/3 (x = t²/4l) this is Shigley's Eq. 14-7, σ = Wt P/(F Y), and Eq. 14-8 adds the Barth velocity factor Kv for the dynamic increment of the load: (600 + V)/600 for cast-profile cast-iron teeth, (1200 + V)/1200 for cut or milled teeth, (50 + √V)/50 for hobbed or shaped teeth and √((78 + √V)/78) for shaved or ground teeth, V in ft/min. The form factors of Table 14-2 are for the load at the tip of a 20° full-depth tooth and are interpolated linearly in the tooth number. The Lewis stress ignores the radial component of the load, stress concentration, load sharing and life; it is the preliminary check the AGMA method refines.

AGMA bending stress and strength

Bending stress number, Eq. 14-15: σ = Wt Ko Kv Ks (Pd/F) (Km KB/J). Allowable bending stress, Eq. 14-17: σall = St YN/(KT KR). The AGMA bending factor of safety is SF = σall/σ (Eq. 14-41).

  • Ko, overload factor: entered from the service (Fig. 14-17; 1.00 for a uniform power source and uniform driven machine).
  • Kv, dynamic factor, Eqs. 14-27 and 14-28: B = 0.25 (12 − Qv)2/3, A = 50 + 56 (1 − B), Kv = [(A + √V)/A]B with V in ft/min, valid up to Vmax = [A + (Qv − 3)]² (Eq. 14-29). Qv is the AGMA transmission accuracy level, 3 to 7 for most commercial gears, 8 to 12 for precision gears.
  • Ks, size factor, Section 14-10 Eq. (a): Ks = 1.192 (F √Y/P)0.0535 in inch units, Y the Lewis form factor; taken as 1 when the fit gives less.
  • Km, load-distribution factor, Eq. 14-30: Km = 1 + Cmc (Cpf Cpm + Cma Ce). Cmc = 1 for uncrowned teeth, 0.8 crowned (Eq. 14-31). Cpf, the pinion proportion factor (Eq. 14-32): F/(10d) − 0.025 for F ≤ 1 in, F/(10d) − 0.0375 + 0.0125 F for 1 < F ≤ 17 in, F/(10d) − 0.1109 + 0.0207 F − 0.000228 F² for 17 < F ≤ 40 in, with F/(10d) taken as 0.05 when smaller, d the pinion pitch diameter. Cpm = 1 for a straddle-mounted pinion with S1/S < 0.175, 1.1 otherwise (Eq. 14-33). Cma = A + B F + C F² (Eq. 14-34) with Table 14-9: open gearing 0.247, 0.0167, −0.765 × 10⁻⁴; commercial enclosed 0.127, 0.0158, −0.930 × 10⁻⁴; precision enclosed 0.0675, 0.0128, −0.926 × 10⁻⁴; extraprecision enclosed 0.00360, 0.0102, −0.822 × 10⁻⁴. Ce = 0.8 when the gearing is adjusted at assembly or lapped, 1 otherwise (Eq. 14-35). Because Cpf uses the pinion diameter, Km is the same for both members.
  • KB, rim-thickness factor, Eq. 14-40: KB = 1.6 ln(2.242/mB) for a backup ratio mB = tR/ht below 1.2, otherwise 1.
  • J, bending geometry factor (Section 14-6): J = Y Kψ/(Kf mN) with the form factor Y of the tooth loaded at the highest point of single-tooth contact (HPSTC), the Dolan-Broghamer stress correction factor Kf and the load-sharing ratio mN = 1 for spur gears. Shigley's Fig. 14-6 (the AGMA 908 chart) gives J against the tooth number for several mating tooth numbers; the tool takes an entered reading or computes J as described below, and always shows both.
  • YN, bending stress-cycle factor (Fig. 14-14): above 3 × 10⁶ cycles the figure gives a band, upper line YN = 1.3558 N−0.0178 (the line Shigley's examples use) and lower line 1.6831 N−0.0323 (critical service); below it the hardness lines 9.4518 N−0.148 (400 HB), 6.1514 N−0.1192 (250 HB), 4.9404 N−0.1045 (160 HB), 3.517 N−0.0817 (case carburized) and 2.3194 N−0.0538 (nitrided). The gear sees NP/NG of the pinion cycles.
  • KT, temperature factor: 1 up to 250 °F; KR, reliability factor, Table 14-10: 0.70, 0.85, 1.00, 1.25 and 1.50 for reliabilities 0.50, 0.90, 0.99, 0.999 and 0.9999 (Eq. 14-38 between them).

AGMA contact stress and strength

Contact stress number, Eq. 14-16: σc = Cp √[Wt Ko Kv Ks Km/(dP F) · Cf/I]; the same for both members except for Ks. Allowable contact stress, Eq. 14-18: σc,all = Sc ZN CH/(KT KR), and SH = σc,all/σc (Eq. 14-42).

  • Cp, elastic coefficient, Eq. 14-13: Cp = √{1/[π ((1 − νP²)/EP + (1 − νG²)/EG)]} in √psi; Table 14-8 rounds it (steel on steel 2300, steel on cast iron 2100, steel on tin bronze 1900 …), and the book's examples use the table values.
  • I, pitting geometry factor, Eq. 14-23 for external spur gears: I = (cos φ sin φ/2) · mG/(mG + 1).
  • Cf, surface condition factor: 1 (no standard values exist).
  • ZN, pitting stress-cycle factor (Fig. 14-15): 2.466 N−0.056 below 10⁷ cycles; above, the upper line 1.4488 N−0.023 or the lower line 2.466 N−0.056; nitrided steels 1.249 N−0.0138.
  • CH, hardness-ratio factor for the gear only (the pinion takes 1). Eq. 14-36 for through-hardened members: CH = 1 + A′ (mG − 1), A′ = 8.98 × 10⁻³ (HBP/HBG) − 8.29 × 10⁻³ for a hardness ratio between 1.2 and 1.7, A′ = 0 below 1.2 and 0.00698 above 1.7. Eq. 14-37 for a surface-hardened pinion (above 48 HRC) with a through-hardened gear (180 to 400 HB): CH = 1 + B′ (450 − HBG), B′ = 0.00075 exp(−0.0112 fP), fP the pinion surface finish in µin rms.

Allowable stress numbers

St and Sc are the AGMA 2001-D04 allowable stress numbers for 10⁷ cycles at 99 % reliability, as Shigley prints them. Through-hardened steel follows the lines of Figs. 14-2 and 14-5: Grade 1 St = 77.3 HB + 12,800 lb/in² and Sc = 322 HB + 29,100 lb/in²; Grade 2 St = 102 HB + 16,400 and Sc = 349 HB + 34,300 (valid for 180 to 400 HB). Nitrided through-hardened steels take St from Fig. 14-3 (Grade 1: 82.3 HB + 12,150; Grade 2: 108.6 HB + 15,890, core hardness) and nitriding steels from Fig. 14-4 (Nitralloy 135M Grade 1: 86.2 HB + 12,730, Grade 2: 113.8 HB + 16,650; 2.5 % chrome Grades 1 to 3: 105.2 HB + 9,280 / 22,280 / 29,280), with Sc from Table 14-6 at 83.5 HR15N (150,000 / 163,000) for the nitrided through-hardened steels, 90 HR15N for Nitralloy (170,000 / 183,000) and 87.5 HR15N for the chrome steels (155,000 / 172,000 / 189,000). Flame or induction hardened steel (50 HRC, Type A): St 45,000 / 55,000, Sc 170,000 / 190,000 for Grades 1 and 2. Carburized and hardened steel: St 55,000 / 65,000 / 75,000 and Sc 180,000 / 225,000 / 275,000 for Grades 1 to 3 (Tables 14-3 and 14-6). Cast irons (Tables 14-4 and 14-7, the lower value of each printed range): gray iron A48 class 20 / 30 / 40 St 5,000 / 8,500 / 13,000 and Sc 50,000 / 65,000 / 75,000; ductile iron A536 60-40-18, 80-55-06, 100-70-03 and 120-90-02 St 22,000 / 22,000 / 27,000 / 31,000 and Sc 77,000 / 77,000 / 92,000 / 103,000. Bronze: sand cast St 5,700, Sc 30,000; heat treated 23,600 and 65,000. For any other material choose "Entered" and type St and Sc.

Computed geometry factor J

When no chart reading is at hand the tool lays out the tooth by the procedure of AGMA 908-B89 Section 5 and the drawing shows the result. The pinion and gear outside radii fix the line of action: the start of the active profile on the member analysed is C1 = C6 − √(ro,mate² − rb,mate²) with C6 = (r + rmate) sin φ, and the highest point of single-tooth contact is a base pitch further, C4 = C1 + pb (contact ratio mp = (C5 − C1)/pb with C5 = √(ro² − rb²)). The load angle follows from tan φnW = C4/rb as φnL = tan φnW − tan φ + φ − π/(2N) and the load line meets the tooth centreline at the radius rnL = rb/cos φnL, the vertex of the Lewis parabola. The fillet is the trochoid swept by the tip radius of the generating rack (addendum 1/P, whole depth 2.4/P and tip radius 0.35/P, the rack of the AGMA chart); the point where the inscribed parabola is tangent to the fillet is found by minimising ξ²/h along the fillet, which is the tangency condition 2 hF tan β = ξ of the standard's iteration (its Eq. 5.63). With the critical thickness sF = 2ξ and height hF, Y = 1/[(cos φnL/cos φ)(6 hF/sF² − tan φnL/sF)] (Eq. 5.78, the second term being the radial compression), Kf = H + (sF/ρF)L (sF/hF)M with H = 0.331 − 0.436 φ, L = 0.324 − 0.492 φ, M = 0.261 + 0.545 φ (φ in radians, Eqs. 5.72 to 5.76) and the minimum fillet radius ρF = rT + (b − rT)²/(r + b − rT) at the root (Eq. 5.68 for a rack), and J = Y/Kf. The computed values agree with the chart readings within about 0.02 (17-tooth pinion with a 52-tooth gear: 0.317 computed against 0.30 read; the 52-tooth gear 0.405 against 0.40). With the same layout, the tip load and no radial term the procedure reproduces the Lewis form factors of Table 14-2 within a few percent (rack 0.479 against 0.485), which is the check on the geometry. A pinion of fewer than about 18 teeth is undercut by this rack; the tool says so and its computed J is then an approximation.

Comparison and rating

Bending stress is proportional to the load while contact stress grows with its square root, so Shigley compares SF with SH² to see which failure mode governs each member (Section 14-19). The power rating at unit AGMA safety factor is the transmitted power times the least of SF,P, SF,G, SH,P² and SH,G², because none of the factors depends on the load. The margins of safety are reported on the same load basis, SF − 1 in bending and SH² − 1 in wear; the AGMA factors already contain the life, reliability and temperature effects.

Units

Lengths, forces, torques, stresses, power and speed convert with the unit switch; the diametral pitch and module, the hardness, the factors and the elastic coefficient (√psi, as the AGMA tables print it) are plain numbers. The AGMA fits are evaluated in inch units internally whatever the display system.




References

Budynas, R. G., and Nisbett, J. K. (2015). Shigley's Mechanical Engineering Design, 10th ed. McGraw-Hill Education, New York.

American Gear Manufacturers Association (2004). Fundamental Rating Factors and Calculation Methods for Involute Spur and Helical Gear Teeth. ANSI/AGMA 2001-D04, Alexandria, VA.

American Gear Manufacturers Association (1989). Geometry Factors for Determining the Pitting Resistance and Bending Strength of Spur, Helical and Herringbone Gear Teeth. AGMA 908-B89, Alexandria, VA.

Lewis, W. (1893). "Investigation of the Strength of Gear Teeth." Proceedings of the Engineers Club of Philadelphia, Vol. 10, pp. 16–23.

Dolan, T. J., and Broghamer, E. L. (1942). A Photoelastic Study of Stresses in Gear Tooth Fillets. University of Illinois Engineering Experiment Station Bulletin 335, Urbana, IL.

Coy, J. J., Townsend, D. P., and Zaretsky, E. V. (1985). Gearing. NASA Reference Publication 1152, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Lewis Research Center, Cleveland, OH.

Norton, R. L. (2020). Machine Design: An Integrated Approach, 6th ed. Pearson, Hoboken, NJ.

Dudley, D. W. (1984). Handbook of Practical Gear Design. McGraw-Hill, New York.

Worked Examples

Published examples this tool reproduces; each page lists the inputs to enter and the printed answers.

All worked examples


DISCLAIMER: The methods and calculation on aNOWysis.com are provided as means to educate the reader. There is no warranty, expessed or implied, as to the relevance or accuracy of the methods or calculations. All calculations should be checked by a qualified analyst for appropriateness and accuracy. We will not be held liable for any damages, injuries or deaths caused by using methods or calculations from this site.