International Organization for Standardization (1988). ISO System of Limits and Fits, Part 1: Bases of Tolerances, Deviations and Fits. ISO 286-1:1988, Geneva.
International Organization for Standardization (1988). ISO System of Limits and Fits, Part 2: Tables of Standard Tolerance Grades and Limit Deviations for Holes and Shafts. ISO 286-2:1988, Geneva.
International Organization for Standardization (2010). Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS), ISO Code System for Tolerances on Linear Sizes, Part 1: Basis of Tolerances, Deviations and Fits. ISO 286-1:2010, Geneva.
Bureau of Indian Standards (1993). ISO System of Limits and Fits, Part 1: Bases of Tolerances, Deviations and Fits. IS 919 (Part 1):1993, identical to ISO 286-1:1988, New Delhi.
Bureau of Indian Standards (1993). ISO System of Limits and Fits, Part 2: Tables of Standard Tolerance Grades and Limit Deviations for Holes and Shafts. IS 919 (Part 2):1993, identical to ISO 286-2:1988, New Delhi.
American National Standards Institute (1978). Preferred Metric Limits and Fits. ANSI B4.2-1978 (R2004), American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York.
American National Standards Institute (1967). Preferred Limits and Fits for Cylindrical Parts. ANSI B4.1-1967 (R2004), American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York.
American Society of Mechanical Engineers (2018). Dimensioning and Tolerancing. ASME Y14.5-2018, New York.
American Society of Mechanical Engineers (2019). Surface Texture (Surface Roughness, Waviness, and Lay). ASME B46.1-2019, New York.
U.S. Army Ordnance Center and School (1996). Fundamentals of Machine Tools. Training Circular TC 9-524, Department of the Army, Washington, DC.
Naval Education and Training Program Management Support Activity (1990). Machinery Repairman 3 and 2. NAVEDTRA 12204, Pensacola, FL.
Goddard Space Flight Center (1994). Engineering Drawing Standards Manual. GSFC X-673-64-1F, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Greenbelt, MD.
Scholz, F. (1995). Tolerance Stack Analysis Methods: A Critical Review. Report ISSTECH-95-030, Boeing Information and Support Services, Seattle, WA.
Marsaglia, G. (2004). "Evaluating the Normal Distribution." Journal of Statistical Software, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 1–11.
Worked Examples
Published examples this tool reproduces; each page lists the inputs to enter and the printed answers.
DISCLAIMER: The methods and calculation on aNOWysis.com are provided as means to educate the reader. There is no warranty, expessed or implied, as to the relevance or accuracy of the methods or calculations. All calculations should be checked by a qualified analyst for appropriateness and accuracy. We will not be held liable for any damages, injuries or deaths caused by using methods or calculations from this site.
Terms of Service & Liability Disclaimer
Please read and accept these terms for the best experience with our analysis tools.
⚠️ Important Legal Notice
BY USING THESE ANALYSIS TOOLS, YOU ACKNOWLEDGE AND AGREE THAT:
NO WARRANTY: These tools are provided "AS IS" and may contain errors, bugs, or inaccuracies
EDUCATIONAL USE ONLY: Results are for preliminary analysis and educational purposes only
NOT PROFESSIONAL ADVICE: These tools do not replace professional engineering judgment
VERIFICATION REQUIRED: All results must be independently verified by a licensed professional engineer
POTENTIAL RISKS: Incorrect results could lead to catastrophic failures causing property damage, injury, or death
Limitation of Liability
UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES SHALL AVERY AEROSPACE CORPORATION, ITS DIRECTORS, EMPLOYEES, OR AFFILIATES BE HELD LIABLE FOR:
Any direct, indirect, incidental, consequential, special, punitive, or exemplary damages
Property damage, personal injury, or death resulting from use of these tools
Errors, inaccuracies, or incorrect calculations produced by the tools
Design failures, structural collapses, or system malfunctions based on tool outputs
Any damages whatsoever, even if we have been advised of the possibility of such damages
Your Responsibilities
You agree to:
Use at Your Own Risk: You assume all risks associated with using these analysis tools
Professional Verification: Engage licensed professional engineers for all critical design work
Independent Judgment: Exercise independent engineering judgment and not rely solely on tool outputs
Code Compliance: Ensure all designs comply with applicable codes, standards, and regulations
Indemnification: Defend and hold harmless the Company from any claims arising from your use of these tools
Acceptance
By clicking "I Accept and Agree" below, you acknowledge that you have read, understood, and agree to be bound by: