Tools › Structures › Fatigue › Random Vibration Fatigue


Random Vibration Fatigue

Fatigue damage and life of a structure under a stationary Gaussian random vibration given as an acceleration power spectral density: the input PSD by breakpoints (log-log segments) or one of the standard profiles (NAVMAT P-9492, the NASA and USAF minimum workmanship levels of NASA-HDBK-7005, MIL-STD-810H common-carrier truck, jet-aircraft cargo and minimum-integrity exposures) with its exact rms; the response PSD of a single-degree-of-freedom structure (fn and Q or damping ratio, or an entered transmissibility table) with the response rms by integration and by Miles' equation; the spectral moments, rates of zero crossings and peaks and the irregularity factor; the stress rms from a stress per g; and the fatigue damage of the entered duration and the time to failure by the narrow-band (Bendat) Rayleigh-peak formula, Dirlik's rainflow-range density, Steinberg's three-band method and the Wirsching–Light correction, with the S-N curve as a Basquin law or a MIL-HDBK-5J equivalent-stress equation, a fatigue damage spectrum over natural frequency and charts of the PSDs and range densities. The default case is illustrative: the NAVMAT P-9492 profile (6.06 g rms) on an SDOF at 100 Hz with Q = 10 (7.82 g rms response), 1 ksi of stress per g and the handbook's unnotched 7075-T6 sheet curve.

  • Input PSD from breakpoints or a standard profile with its exact log-log rms; response PSD, rms, Miles' equation, spectral moments, E[0], E[P] and the irregularity factor

  • Damage and life by the narrow-band formula, Dirlik's density, Steinberg's three bands and Wirsching–Light, for a Basquin or MIL-HDBK-5J S-N curve with Kf and a life factor

  • Fatigue damage spectrum over natural frequency for the entered PSD and S-N curve

  • Charts of input and response PSD (log-log) and of the Dirlik and Rayleigh range densities

Random Vibration Fatigue


Unit System: /

Input Acceleration PSD (breakpoints in Hz and g2/Hz, log-log segments between them; duration in hours)







Structure (frequencies in Hz)






Stress per g of Response (σ1g: stress at the critical point for 1 g of response acceleration)






S-N Curve (fully reversed cycles; handbook equations in ksi)










Damage Options






×

Random Vibration Fatigue

Random Vibration Fatigue: PSD Integration, Spectral Moments, Miles, Dirlik, Narrow Band, Steinberg and Wirsching–Light

The problem

Equipment on a vehicle, a launcher or a shaker table sees a vibration that is random: no single frequency, no repeating waveform, only statistics. The standard description of a stationary Gaussian random vibration is its one-sided power spectral density W(f), the mean square acceleration per hertz, in g²/Hz against frequency in Hz. Its integral over frequency is the mean square acceleration, so the overall level is grms = √(∫W df). Test specifications (MIL-STD-810H Method 514.8, NAVMAT P-9492, NASA-HDBK-7005 and the GEVS) give W(f) as a few breakpoints joined by straight lines on log-log paper, with the overall g rms printed beside the curve. A structure mounted on that base amplifies the input near its natural frequencies, the stress at a critical point follows the response, and the question is how long the part lasts under a stress that is itself a Gaussian random process. The tool answers it in the frequency domain, without generating a time history, by the methods below.

Units and conventions

PSD levels are in g²/Hz and frequencies in Hz throughout; they are plain numbers and the unit switch leaves them alone. The stress per g (and the mass and area of the spring-mass form) go through the unit system (ksi or MPa, lbm or kg, in² or mm²) and are converted to SI base units for the calculation; stresses are reported in ksi (USCS) or MPa (SI). Durations are in hours, lives in hours (or minutes when short). The spectral moments are taken with frequency in Hz, mn = ∫ fn G(f) df, which gives rates directly per second; the dimensionless ratios (irregularity factor, Dirlik's xm) are the same whether Hz or rad/s are used. The S-N curve is for fully reversed cycles: a zero-mean random stress has R = −1, and a static mean stress (gravity, preload) is not included.

Input PSD and its rms

Between two breakpoints (f1, W1) and (f2, W2) the specification is a straight line on log-log axes, W = W1(f/f1)m with m = log(W2/W1)/log(f2/f1). The slope in dB per octave is 10 log10(2m) = 3.01 m: +3 dB/octave is m = 1 (W proportional to f), −6 dB/octave is m = −2. The area of a segment is exact, W1f1[(f2/f1)m+1 − 1]/(m + 1), or W1f1 ln(f2/f1) when m = −1, and the overall level is the square root of the sum. The standard profiles on the dropdown reproduce the rms values printed in their sources: NAVMAT P-9492 Figure 5 (0.04 g²/Hz from 80 to 350 Hz with 3 dB/octave slopes to 20 and 2000 Hz; the document prints 6.0 g rms, the exact integral is 6.06 g), NASA-HDBK-7005 Table 8.9 (the NASA minimum workmanship level, 0.04 g²/Hz 80–500 Hz, 6.8 g rms) and Table 8.10 (USAF units, 0.04 g²/Hz 150–600 Hz with a −6 dB/octave roll-off, 6.1 g rms), MIL-STD-810H Figure 514.8E-1 (minimum integrity, 0.04 g²/Hz 20–1000 Hz then −6 dB/octave, 7.7 g rms, one hour per axis), Table 514.8C-I (common-carrier truck, vertical, 1.08 g rms for 1,000 miles in 60 minutes), Table 514.8C-II (the envelope for unknown orientation, 1.17 g rms) and Table 514.8C-IX (jet aircraft cargo general exposure, 4.02 g rms, one minute per take-off). The flat PSD of level W between f1 and f2 has rms √(W(f2 − f1)): 0.04 g²/Hz from 20 to 2000 Hz gives 8.9 g.

Response of a single-degree-of-freedom structure

A mass on a spring and damper fixed to the vibrating base has the absolute-acceleration transmissibility |H(f)|² = [1 + (2ζr)²]/[(1 − r²)² + (2ζr)²], r = f/fn, Q = 1/(2ζ), and the response PSD is Gout(f) = |H|² W(f) (Bendat and Piersol). For a flat input the integral over all frequencies is exact, ∫|H|² df = (π/2) fn Q (1 + 1/Q²), so grms = √[(π/2) fn Q W (1 + 1/Q²)]; Miles (1954) dropped the 1/Q² term and his equation grms = √(π fn Q W/2) is the everyday estimate of a resonant response, within 0.5 % for Q = 10. The tool integrates the actual PSD over its own band by Simpson's rule on a grid that clusters points across the resonance (about a thousand intervals), so the integrated rms differs from Miles' value when the PSD slopes near fn or the band is cut: for the NAVMAT profile at fn = 100 Hz, Q = 10 the integral gives 7.82 g rms, Miles 7.93 g. A measured or computed transmissibility can be pasted instead as |H| against frequency (interpolated linearly in |H| against log f, end values held), for example the response of a particular mode from a finite-element model.

Spectral moments, crossings and peaks

Rice (1944) showed that a stationary Gaussian process with one-sided PSD G(f) crosses zero upward at the expected rate E[0] = √(m2/m0) and has peaks at the rate E[P] = √(m4/m2), with mn = ∫ fn G df. Their ratio, the irregularity factor γ = E[0]/E[P] = m2/√(m0m4), is 1 for a narrow-band process (every cycle crosses zero, so peaks and zero crossings are equally frequent) and falls toward 0 as high-frequency ripple adds peaks that do not cross zero; ε = √(1 − γ²) is the bandwidth parameter and α1 = m1/√(m0m2) the first bandwidth ratio; Dirlik's mean frequency is xm = (m1/m0)√(m2/m4) = α1γ. For a resonant response under a broadband input the fourth moment is dominated by the ripple above the resonance (Gout falls only as 1/r² there), so E[P] and γ depend on the upper frequency limit of the input: the NAVMAT response at 100 Hz, Q = 10, has E[0] = 101 Hz but E[P] = 143 Hz and γ = 0.71 when the input runs to 2000 Hz. The number of stress cycles in an exposure of T seconds is E[0]T, the number of peaks E[P]T.

Stress and the S-N curve

The stress at the critical point is proportional to the response acceleration, σ(t) = Kf σ1g a(t)/g, where σ1g is the stress for 1 g of response (from a static 1 g analysis or a unit load in a finite-element model; for a mass m on a member of stressed area A it is m g/A) and Kf the fatigue notch factor. The stress PSD is (Kfσ1g)² Gout, so the stress rms is Kfσ1g grms and its rates and irregularity are the response's. The S-N curve may be a Basquin law N = A/Sab for the amplitude Sa (with an optional endurance limit below which no damage is counted) or a MIL-HDBK-5J best-fit equation log N = A − B log(Seq − C), Seq = Smax(1 − R)p, which for the fully reversed cycles of a zero-mean process (R = −1) becomes Seq = 2pSa; a handbook curve with C = 0 is a Basquin law with b = B and Abq = 10A/2pB, so the closed forms below apply to it exactly, while a curve with C > 0 is integrated numerically. Ten unnotched handbook curves (aluminum and steel) are on the dropdown, taken from the equations filed for the Spectrum Fatigue tool; their constants fill the fields and stay editable.

Damage by the narrow-band formula

For a narrow-band Gaussian process the peaks are Rayleigh distributed and each peak is followed by a trough of about the same size, so every peak is a cycle of range S = 2a: in the normalized range z = S/(2σ) the range density is p(z) = z e−z²/2 and Miner's rule gives DNB = E[P] T ∫ p(z)/N(σz) dz (Bendat 1964; Bishop 1988 eq. 2.57). With a Basquin curve the integral is Γ(1 + b/2)(√2σ)b/A, the familiar closed form. Applied to a wide-band process the narrow-band formula pairs every peak with an equally large trough and so overestimates the large ranges: it is an upper bound on the rainflow damage, often by 30 to 50 % for a resonant response with a broadband tail (Bishop 1988, section 2.7).

Dirlik's rainflow-range density

Dirlik (1985) generated time histories from seventy spectra of different shapes, rainflow counted them and fitted a closed-form density to the counted ranges in terms of γ and xm alone: p(z) = (D1/Q) e−z/Q + (D2z/R²) e−z²/2R² + D3z e−z²/2, an exponential term for the small ranges of the ripple, a Rayleigh term of reduced scale R and the full Rayleigh term, with D1 = 2(xm − γ²)/(1 + γ²), R = (γ − xm − D1²)/(1 − γ − D1 + D1²), D2 = (1 − γ − D1 + D1²)/(1 − R), D3 = 1 − D1 − D2 and Q = 1.25(γ − D3 − D2R)/D1 (thesis pp. 128–129; the same relations are restated in Bishop 1988, section 3.2). The density integrates to one and its moments are closed, E[zb] = D1QbΓ(1 + b) + D2(√2R)bΓ(1 + b/2) + D32b/2Γ(1 + b/2), which the test script uses to check the numerical integration. The damage is D = E[P] T ∫ p(z)/N(σz) dz with the same number of peaks. For a resonant response with a broadband tail (γ about 0.7 with α1 near 1) the relations give a negative R; only R² enters the density, which remains a proper density, and the tool reports the value. Dirlik's method has been the reference frequency-domain method since Bishop and Sherratt's comparisons, usually within 10 to 20 % of a long rainflow count; the project's own seeded time-domain check (20,000 s of the default response, rainflow counted) is recorded in the References folder and in the test script.

Steinberg's three-band method

Steinberg (Vibration Analysis for Electronic Equipment) simplifies the Gaussian response to three stress levels: the response spends 68.27 % of its time within ±1σ, 27.18 % between 1σ and 2σ and 4.28 % between 2σ and 3σ (the normal probabilities; peaks beyond 3σ are ignored), and the E[0]T cycles of the exposure are counted at those amplitudes, D = n1σ/N(σ) + n2σ/N(2σ) + n3σ/N(3σ). It is the method of the electronics industry for lead-wire and solder-joint fatigue and is easy to do by hand; its result lies between the narrow-band and Dirlik values for the usual S-N slopes because the 3σ truncation removes the rare large peaks that the Rayleigh tail carries.

Wirsching–Light correction

Wirsching and Light (1980) kept the narrow-band formula and corrected it with a factor fitted to rainflow counts of simulated wide-band histories: D = λ DNB, λ = a + (1 − a)(1 − ε)c, a = 0.926 − 0.033b, c = 1.587b − 2.323, ε = √(1 − γ²), for S-N slopes b from 3 to 10 and γ from 0.45 to 1 (Bishop 1988 eqs. 3.1–3.3). For the default case (γ = 0.71, b = 5.8) λ = 0.73. The factor depends on γ and b alone; Dirlik's density also uses the first moment, which Bishop shows reduces the scatter of the prediction.

Life, duration and life factor

Each method gives the damage of the entered exposure and the time to failure T/D; the two are proportional, so the time to failure does not depend on the duration entered. A life factor (scatter factor) multiplies the damage and divides the life: the handbook S-N curves are mean curves with a standard error of 0.2 to 0.5 decades on log life, and a factor of 4 is the usual aerospace allowance on a mean curve. Miner's rule takes the damage as linear and sequence-independent. D ≥ 1 means the exposure exceeds the mean life.

Fatigue damage spectrum

The fatigue damage spectrum (FDS) is the damage of the exposure for a family of single-degree-of-freedom structures of the same Q and stress per g, plotted against their natural frequency. It is the fatigue counterpart of the shock response spectrum and the basis of test tailoring (MIL-STD-810H Method 514.8 Annex A, Lalanne): two environments with the same FDS do the same damage to a structure of given fn, which is how a long service exposure is compressed into a shorter, higher-level test. The response rms follows √(fn W(fn)) and the cycle count follows fn, so across a flat PSD the damage rises with frequency as fn1 + b/2, and it peaks where the input PSD is high.

Reading the results

The input section tabulates every segment with its slope and area and prints the overall g rms beside the value the source prints. The response section gives Miles' estimate and the integrated rms, the moments table, E[0], E[P], γ and the number of cycles in the exposure, with the two PSDs drawn on log-log axes. The damage section lists the four methods with the damage, the time to failure and the ratio to the narrow-band result, in bold the headline method chosen on the form, and draws Dirlik's density against the Rayleigh density. The damage spectrum closes the page. A time to failure shorter than the specified test duration, or D ≥ 1, means the part will not pass the test on a mean S-N curve; the usual remedies are a lower response (a stiffer mount to move fn where the PSD is low, or more damping), a lower stress per g (a thicker section, a shorter lever arm) or a notch-free detail.

Limits

Stationary Gaussian input and a linear structure (no clipping, no kurtosis correction, no sine-on-random); one mode at a time unless a full transmissibility is pasted; the S-N curve is used as entered with no mean-stress correction; the frequency-domain methods are approximations to a rainflow count, with the narrow-band formula as the upper bound and Dirlik the usual best estimate; short exposures where the number of cycles is small are outside the statistical description.




References

Dirlik, T. (1985). Application of Computers in Fatigue Analysis. Ph.D. thesis, University of Warwick, Coventry.

Bishop, N. W. M. (1988). The Use of Frequency Domain Parameters to Predict Structural Fatigue. Ph.D. thesis, University of Warwick, Coventry.

Bendat, J. S. (1964). Probability Functions for Random Responses: Prediction of Peaks, Fatigue Damage, and Catastrophic Failures. NASA Contractor Report CR-33, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC.

Miles, J. W. (1954). "On Structural Fatigue Under Random Loading." Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences, Vol. 21, No. 11, pp. 753–762.

Wirsching, P. H., and Light, M. C. (1980). "Fatigue Under Wide Band Random Stresses." Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE, Vol. 106, No. ST7, pp. 1593–1607.

Steinberg, D. S. (2000). Vibration Analysis for Electronic Equipment, 3rd ed. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

Rice, S. O. (1944). "Mathematical Analysis of Random Noise." Bell System Technical Journal, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 282–332.

Bendat, J. S., and Piersol, A. G. (2010). Random Data: Analysis and Measurement Procedures, 4th ed. John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, NJ.

National Aeronautics and Space Administration (2001). Dynamic Environmental Criteria. NASA-HDBK-7005, 13 March 2001.

U.S. Department of Defense (2019). Environmental Engineering Considerations and Laboratory Tests. MIL-STD-810H, 31 January 2019.

U.S. Department of the Navy, Naval Material Command (1979). Navy Manufacturing Screening Program. NAVMAT P-9492, May 1979.

U.S. Department of Defense (2003). Metallic Materials and Elements for Aerospace Vehicle Structures. MIL-HDBK-5J, 31 January 2003.

ASTM International (2017). Standard Practices for Cycle Counting in Fatigue Analysis. ASTM E1049-85(2017), West Conshohocken, PA.

Miner, M. A. (1945). "Cumulative Damage in Fatigue." Journal of Applied Mechanics, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. A159–A164.

Worked Examples

Published examples this tool reproduces; each page lists the inputs to enter and the printed answers.

All worked examples


DISCLAIMER: The methods and calculation on aNOWysis.com are provided as means to educate the reader. There is no warranty, expessed or implied, as to the relevance or accuracy of the methods or calculations. All calculations should be checked by a qualified analyst for appropriateness and accuracy. We will not be held liable for any damages, injuries or deaths caused by using methods or calculations from this site.