Tools › Mechanical Design › Shafts › Interference and Press Fit


Interference and Press Fit

Contact pressure, stresses and holding capacity of a hub shrunk or pressed on a solid or hollow shaft by Lamé's thick-cylinder solution: the pressure from the diametral interference and the two materials' moduli, the radial and hoop stresses through both parts, von Mises and Tresca at the hub bore and the shaft surface against yield with a design factor, the elastic limit of the interference, the holding torque and axial force by friction, the press force, the heating or cooling for a shrink assembly, the loosening of the fit with speed and the release speed, and the effect of an external pressure and a transmitted torque. The interference is entered with a tolerance on each part and a surface-finish loss, so the loose, nominal and tight fits are all reported.

  • Contact pressure from the diametral interference by the compatibility of the two radial displacements (Lamé, plane stress), for different hub and shaft materials and a hollow shaft

  • Radial and hoop stresses across both parts, von Mises and Tresca at the hub bore and the shaft surface, first-yield pressures and the largest elastic interference

  • Holding torque and axial force, press force, shrink-assembly heating or cooling, loosening with speed and the release speed, external pressure and torque superposed

  • Loose, nominal and tight fits from the entered tolerances and surface-finish loss; margins on yield and on slip with an entered design factor

Interference and Press Fit


Unit System: /

Geometry (hub bore = shaft diameter = the interface diameter d)





Interference, Friction and Design Factor (diametral values)









Hub Material (outer part)

Sign in






Shaft Material (inner part)

Sign in






Service Conditions (0 for none)





×

Interference and Press Fit

Lamé Solution, Yield, Holding Capacity and Assembly

The thick-cylinder fields

A hub pressed or shrunk on a shaft is two thick cylinders squeezed together by the contact pressure p over their common surface of radius rc. Lamé's solution for an axisymmetric cylinder in plane stress (free ends, no axial stress) is σr = A − B/r² and σθ = A + B/r², the two constants set by the pressures on its inner and outer surfaces: for a cylinder of radii a and b under inner pressure pi and outer pressure po, A = (a² pi − b² po)/(b² − a²) and B = (pi − po) a² b²/(b² − a²). The hub carries p on its bore and any outside pressure on its outer surface; the shaft carries p on its outside and nothing on its bore (a solid shaft is a cylinder with a = 0, uniformly compressed to −p in both directions). The radial displacement follows from Hooke's law as u = r (σθ − ν σr)/E.

Contact pressure from the interference

Before assembly the shaft is larger than the bore by the diametral interference δd; after assembly the bore has moved out and the shaft surface in by amounts that add up to the radial interference δr = δd/2. Each displacement is proportional to p: the hub bore moves out by Ch p with Ch = (rc/Eh)[(ro² + rc²)/(ro² − rc²) + νh], the shaft surface moves in by Cs p with Cs = (rc/Es)[(rc² + ri²)/(rc² − ri²) − νs] (1 − νs in the bracket for a solid shaft), so p = δr/(Ch + Cs). With equal materials and a solid shaft the Poisson terms cancel and the expression reduces to p = E δd (Do² − d²)/(2 d Do²), the form printed in NASA/TM-2008-215153 for bearing rings on shafts. A thin hub (wall t much smaller than rc) on a rigid shaft gives the thin-ring limit p = E δr t/rc², the hoop-strain relation of a ring. An outside pressure on the hub closes its bore by 2 ro² rc po/[Eh(ro² − rc²)]; that closure acts as extra interference and raises p.

Tolerances and surface finish

The parts are made to tolerances, so the interference lies between the loose combination (smallest shaft, largest bore) and the tight one. The tool takes the nominal interference at the mean of the tolerances and a half-band on each part, and reports all three fits: the tight fit governs the stresses and the press force, the loose fit the holding torque. On assembly the asperities of the two surfaces are flattened and a little of the interference is lost; NASA/TM-2008-215153 took 0.004 mm (160 µin) off the diametral interference of accurately ground bearing seats, and a common shop rule is about three times the roughness average of each surface. The entered finish loss is subtracted from every case.

Stresses, yield and margins

The hub's largest stresses are at its bore: a hoop tension p (ro² + rc²)/(ro² − rc²) and a radial compression −p. The shaft is in compression everywhere; a hollow shaft's largest stress is the uniaxial hoop compression −2 p rc²/(rc² − ri²) at its bore. With σz = 0 the von Mises stress is √(σr² + σθ² − σrσθ + 3τ²), τ being the torsional shear T r/J of a transmitted torque, and the Tresca stress the largest difference of the three principal stresses. First yield of the hub by Tresca is at pY = Fty(1 − rc²/ro²)/2, a little below the von Mises value Fty/√(k² + k + 1) with k the hoop-to-pressure ratio; a solid shaft yields at p = Fty. The largest elastic interference is the smaller first-yield pressure times 2 (Ch + Cs). The margins compare the yield strength of each part with the design factor times the governing von Mises stress of the tight fit, taking the worse of the assembled state at rest and the state at the operating speed.

Holding torque, axial force and press force

With the pressure taken uniform over the engaged length L, the normal force on the interface is p 2π rc L and Coulomb friction with coefficient μ gives the holding torque T = 2π rc² L p μ and the axial holding force F = 2π rc L p μ. The slip check puts the resultant demand √(Fapp² + (Tapp/rc)²) against the capacity of the loose fit at the operating speed. The press force is the axial friction force with the assembly coefficient and the nominal pressure; it builds up during insertion as the contact length grows, so the final value is the largest. The coefficient of friction is the least certain number in the analysis: it depends on the finish, the lubricant, whether the joint was pressed or shrunk, and the time in service, and should come from tests on the actual parts.

Shrink assembly

Heating the hub by ΔT grows its bore by αh d ΔT. To clear the shaft at the tight fit with an assembly gap ca, ΔTh = (δd,max + ca)/(αh d); cooling the shaft instead needs ΔTs = −(δd,max + ca)/(αs d), and a combination of both is often used for large interferences. The expansion coefficient is the mean value between room temperature and the assembly temperature. The hub must stay below the temperature that would draw its temper.

Rotation

A rotating ring grows outward. In plane stress the free rotating annulus of inner radius a and outer radius b has σr = (3 + ν) ρ ω² (a² + b² − a² b²/r² − r²)/8 and σθ = (3 + ν) ρ ω² [a² + b² + a² b²/r² − (1 + 3ν) r²/(3 + ν)]/8, the forms printed in NASA TM 87165, so its bore grows by u = ρ ω² a [(3 + ν) b² + (1 − ν) a²]/(4E); a solid disk's surface grows by ρ ω² b³ (1 − ν)/(4E). The hub bore grows faster than the shaft surface, the difference comes off the interference, and the contact pressure falls as the square of the speed until it reaches zero at the release speed ω0. Because the elastic fields superpose, the stresses at speed are the Lamé fields with the reduced pressure plus the free rotating fields; the hub bore hoop stress may rise or fall with speed depending on the proportions.

What is not covered

The pressure is not uniform in reality: it peaks sharply at the ends of the hub where the shaft continues beyond it, and that peak together with the fretting it causes is the usual fatigue origin of a press-fitted shaft (Pilkey's Peterson's Stress Concentration Factors gives the factors). Plane stress is right for a hub of about the shaft's diameter in length; a very long hub is nearer plane strain. Plastic shrink fits, the loss of interference by creep or by differential thermal expansion of two materials in service, bending stresses in the shaft and the effect of keyways on the fit are outside the tool.




References

Lamé, G. (1852). Leçons sur la théorie mathématique de l'élasticité des corps solides. Bachelier, Paris.

Timoshenko, S. (1941). Strength of Materials, Part II: Advanced Theory and Problems, 2nd ed. D. Van Nostrand, New York.

Coe, H. H., and Zaretsky, E. V. (1986). Effect of Interference Fits on Roller Bearing Fatigue Life. NASA Technical Memorandum 87165, Lewis Research Center, Cleveland, OH.

Oswald, F. B., Zaretsky, E. V., and Poplawski, J. V. (2008). Interference-Fit Life Factors for Roller Bearings. NASA Technical Memorandum 2008-215153, Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, OH.

U.S. Department of Defense (2003). Metallic Materials and Elements for Aerospace Vehicle Structures. MIL-HDBK-5J, 31 January 2003.

Budynas, R. G., and Nisbett, J. K. (2015). Shigley's Mechanical Engineering Design, 10th ed. McGraw-Hill Education, New York.

Young, W. C., Budynas, R. G., and Sadegh, A. M. (2012). Roark's Formulas for Stress and Strain, 8th ed. McGraw-Hill, New York.

Pilkey, W. D., Pilkey, D. F., and Bi, Z. (2020). Peterson's Stress Concentration Factors, 4th ed. John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, NJ.

Juvinall, R. C., and Marshek, K. M. (2012). Fundamentals of Machine Component Design, 5th ed. John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, NJ.

Worked Examples

Published examples this tool reproduces; each page lists the inputs to enter and the printed answers.

All worked examples


DISCLAIMER: The methods and calculation on aNOWysis.com are provided as means to educate the reader. There is no warranty, expessed or implied, as to the relevance or accuracy of the methods or calculations. All calculations should be checked by a qualified analyst for appropriateness and accuracy. We will not be held liable for any damages, injuries or deaths caused by using methods or calculations from this site.