Tools › Building Systems › Codes and Compliance › Envelope UA Compliance › Example
2,000 ft² single-storey house in Chicago (climate zone 5): total-UA trade-off against the DOE-reprinted IECC U-factors, a 2x6 R-21 + R-5 wall from its layers, degree-day energy and a Glaser condensation check
| Tool | Envelope UA Compliance |
| Source | U.S. Department of Energy, Building Energy Codes Program (2019). Energy Code Compliance Paths. Presentation slides, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA. Slide 15 (IECC Table R402.1.4 U-factor alternative as reprinted, and the zone-5 framed-wall example); Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (2005). REScheck Technical Support Document. PNNL-14864-1-2, Appendix A eq. (A.1) and Table A.9; Stovall, T. K. (2008). Supporting Documentation for the 2008 Insulation Fact Sheet Update. ORNL/TM-2008/017, Tables 1 and 9; National Centers for Environmental Information (2021). U.S. Climate Normals 2020: U.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals (1991–2020), station USW00094846. |
| Level | Undergraduate |
Problem
A 40 × 50 ft single-storey house (2,000 ft² ceiling and floor, 1,280 ft² of net wall, 300 ft² of windows, a 40 ft² door, 18,000 ft³ at 0.35 ACH) in Chicago, IECC climate zone 5, has a ceiling at U 0.026, a floor over a crawl space at U 0.047 (above the zone's 0.033), windows at U 0.30 / SHGC 0.30 and a 2x6 wall of latex-painted gypsum, polyethylene, R-21 cavity insulation, plywood, R-5 foam sheathing and siding with 25 % framing. Find the wall U-factor by the parallel-path method, decide total-UA compliance against the zone-5 U-factors of the DOE reprint, the window-to-wall ratio, the annual heating energy and gas use at 92 % AFUE with the NCEI 1991–2020 degree days, the design heat loss at 0 °F, the balance point with 3,000 Btu/h of internal gains, and whether the wall condenses at 70 °F / 35 % indoors and 0 °F / 80 % outdoors.
Inputs to Enter
- Assemblies (A ft², U proposed, U required Btu/h·ft²·°F): ceiling 2,000 / 0.026 / 0.026; walls 1,280 / from layers / 0.060; floor 2,000 / 0.047 / 0.033; windows 300 / 0.30 / 0.32 (SHGC 0.30 vs 0.40); door 40 / 0.30 / 0.32; zone 5; no slab term
- Layers inside first: inside film 0.68; 1/2 in gypsum 0.45 (10 perm); polyethylene (0.06 perm); cavity R-21, 5.5 in; plywood 1.32 (0.7 perm); foam R-5, 1 in (1.1 perm); siding 0.81; outside film 0.17; framing fraction 0.25 at 1.25 per inch (TSD 6.88 for a 2x6); wood framing (ORNL 0.75)
- Chicago O'Hare NCEI normals HDD 5,974.3 / CDD 1,003.3 (base 65 °F); set point 70 °F, design 0 °F, 0.35 ACH × 18,000 ft³, internal gains 3,000 Btu/h, AFUE 0.92, COP 3.5, natural gas 100,000 Btu/therm at 1.20, electricity 0.15 per kWh; indoor RH 35 %, outdoor 80 %
Answers
- Wall: series R = 29.43 (U 0.0340 without framing); common path 8.43, framing path 15.31, cavity path 29.43 → U = 0.25/15.31 + 0.75/29.43 = 0.04182 Btu/h·ft²·°F (R 23.9); ORNL reduced clear wall 0.75 × 24.43 + 5 = R 23.3, U 0.0429 (the fact sheet's Table 9 prints 0.0429 for R-21 + R-5)
- UA proposed 301.53 vs required 303.60 Btu/h·°F: complies by total UA with a 0.68 % margin; the floor (94.0 vs 66.0) fails its own value and is carried by the walls (53.5 vs 76.8); WWR 21.0 %, area-weighted U 0.0537, SHGC 0.30 ≤ 0.40
- Infiltration UA 0.018 × 0.35 × 18,000 = 113.4; total UA 414.9 Btu/h·°F; design heat loss 29,045 Btu/h at 0 °F; Q_h = 24 × 414.9 × 5,974.3 = 59.49 MMBtu, 646.7 therms (776 per year); cooling conduction + infiltration 9.99 MMBtu, 837 kWh; balance point 70 − 3,000/414.9 = 62.8 °F
- Glaser: indoor p_v 876.6 Pa (dew point 41.1 °F), outdoor 102.1 Pa over ice; the largest p_v / p_sat at an interior interface is 0.78 (after the siding), so no condensation; the polyethylene drops the vapour pressure to 196.8 Pa behind the cavity where the plywood face is 17.4 °F (p_sat 306 Pa)
- SI: UA 159.06 vs 160.2 W/K, wall U 0.2375 W/m²·K, design loss 8.51 kW, Q_h 62.77 GJ, balance point 17.1 °C
Notes
The tool's default inputs are this case; press Submit. The house is illustrative; every number is reproduced by the independent numpy script References/Envelope-UA/checks/envelope_check.py (test_envelope_ua_compliance.php, 327 checks), which also reproduces the ORNL fact-sheet Table 9 composite U-values, the REScheck TSD Table A.10 and A.2 sample U-factors, the DOE slide's zone-5 example and the Wood Handbook Table 4-7 conductivities. The required U-factors are the DOE reprint of IECC Table R402.1.4; the adopted edition's values are entered in the table.